Blog - Comparing Process Mining and Process Intelligence Products

Comparing Process Mining & Process Intelligence Solutions

Process Mining Meets AI

[interface] screenshot of cybersecurity dashboard interface (for an ai cybersecurity company)

Introduction to Process Mining and Process Intelligence

Process Mining has emerged as a critical technology for organisations to discover, analyse, and improve their business processes using data. It works by extracting time-stamped event logs from enterprise systems (ERP, CRM, etc.) and showing the actual process flows with every step, path, and duration. This data-driven approach provides transparency into how processes truly operate (as opposed to how they are assumed to operate), helping identify bottlenecks, deviations, and opportunities for improvement.

Over the past decade, the field has evolved beyond basic process mapping into broader Process Intelligence, which combines traditional Process Mining with real-time monitoring, predictive analytics, and even automated optimisation. Major analysts and vendors often refer to this holistic approach as Process Intelligence or Execution Management, indicating a shift from just discovering processes to actively managing and enhancing them.

The market for Process Mining and intelligence tools has grown rapidly, with many vendors entering the space. Early pioneers like Celonis have become market leaders, while large enterprise software companies (SAP, IBM, Microsoft, etc.) have acquired or developed their own solutions. Gartner’s reviews list dozens of process mining tools.

Each tool tends to have a unique focus. Some excel at enterprise-wide analytics, others at seamless integration with specific source systems, and some at quick deployment or task-level insights. Selecting the right solution requires an understanding of not only their features but also how they align with your organisation’s systems, expertise, and objectives.

In the following sections, we provide an overview of common functionality, new AI-driven capabilities, service and support considerations, profiles of leading vendors/products, a detailed comparison of their strengths, and guidance on which product might best fit certain scenarios.

Core Functionalities of Process Mining Tools

Modern process mining platforms vary in features, but most offer a core set of functionalities that support the journey from raw data to actionable process improvement. Listed below are some of the key capablities that Process Mining and Process Intelligence products offer.

Process Discovery
‍Automatically generating an interactive process flowchart from event log data. This reveals the actual paths taken in a process, how often each path occurs, the volume and duration. Users can typically filter by case attributes (event combinations) or time frames to focus on specific variants of the process.

insert_chart_outlined

Process Insight (dashboards) Interactive dashboards with graphs, charts, and tables that allow users to explore various metrics of the process. These might show KPIs like throughput times, frequencies of activities, compliance violations, etc., and allow drilling down into details by clicking on parts of the visualisations.

query_stats

Process Analytics (queries)
Analytical tools (with a SQL-like language or visual analysis builder) to perform deeper analysis of loaded process data. This enables power users to define custom metrics, perform root cause analysis (e.g. correlating process outcomes with attributes), and answer ad-hoc questions beyond the pre-built dashboards.

install_desktop

Data Integration
Connectors and integration methods to pull data from various source systems (ERP, CRM, BPM, custom applications) into the process mining tool. Leading platforms come with a wide range of pre-built connectors or ETL tools, enabling easier extraction of event logs. (Celonis, for instance, is known for extensive connectors to systems like SAP, Oracle, Salesforce, etc.). Others may rely on generic APIs or CSV uploads, often involving more effort and limiting options for complex data sourcing and automated scheduling.

join_left

Data Pre-Processing
The ability to perform data transformations or filtering before loading into the process mining tool. This leverages database or data warehouse capabilities to handle large data volumes efficiently (reducing the load on the mining platform) and to clean or aggregate data for improved performance and reduced hosting costs. Not all tools support this; those that do (e.g. IBM, Intellifold) can use SQL or scripts to prepare data, improving performance and flexibility.

scatter_plot

Predictive Analytics (ML)
Machine learning and advanced analytics features that predict future outcomes or risks in a process. These often involve statistical analyses and Machine Learning (ML). For example, the tool might predict which ongoing cases are likely to miss a deadline, if a known issue is likely to occur, or which customers might churn based on patterns. These insights allow proactive intervention.

account_tree

Process Modelling & Conformance
‍Functionality to manually model an ideal business process (often using BPMN diagrams) and compare it against the discovered process map. This helps incompliance and conformance checking, highlighting where real processes deviate from documented procedures. Some tools (e.g. SAP Signavio, Software AG ARIS) are particularly strong in combining Process Mining with Process Modelling and enterprise architecture.

mode

Process Simulation
‍The ability to run "what-if” scenarios by simulating changes to the process (such as adding resources, changing a step, or re-routing flows) and analysing the impact on performance. Simulation is valuable for forecasting the outcome of process changes before implementing them in reality. Not all products have simulation; those with academic roots (Apromore) or those from BPM tool origins (ARIS, Signavio) typically include this.

notifications_active

Alerts & Monitoring
‍Setting up automated alerts or notifications when certain process conditions occur. For example, the tool can send an email or SMS if a case is stuck in a certain step beyond a threshold time, or if data characterises drop below a target, or indicate high-risk process activities or transactions. Alerts provide real-time monitoring to catch and address issues directly.

bookmark_added

Audit & Compliance Reporting
‍Generating reports and audit trails of process execution for compliance purposes. This can include exportable reports showing who did what and when, where deviations occurred, and logs that satisfy regulatory requirements. Easy to export exceptions, evidence for audit sampling, and assurance where process paths are expected or transactions are low risk.

play_circle

Action Workflow
Enabling follow-up actions or remediation workflows directly from the process mining insights. For instance, some platforms let you trigger a case in a workflow system or create ticket for process owners to act on a discovered issue. A few platforms have built-in action engines or can integrate with RPA/BPM tools to close the loop from insight to action.

screen_search_desktop

Task Mining
Capturing and analysing user interactions on the desktop/laptop or at the UI level to enrich process understanding. Task mining may record clicks, keystrokes, and screen data to discover the manual steps users take. This is useful for processes that involve offline work or multiple systems without unified logs. Tools like ABBYY Timeline and UiPath offer strong task mining capabilities.

settings

Process Automation
Some platforms extend into directly automating processes by triggering the setup of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) bots or providing low-code tools to implement process improvements. UiPath and IBM are notable for tightly integrating RPA with Process Mining, so users can go from discovering an inefficiency to deploying a bot to fix it. Others, rely on third-party integrations for workflow orchestration and automating specific actions.

smart_toy

Artificial Intelligence
In the last couple of years, AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) have started to augment Process Mining tools in novel ways. Vendors are introducing conversational interfaces and intelligent assistants to make interacting with process data more intuitive. It can be used to perform root cause analyses, to accelerate solution development, and to support process improvement and process automation.

AI insights & root cause analyses

This refers to leveraging advanced AI (particularly LLMs) to enable intuitive, conversational interactions with process data. Instead of manually exploring dashboards and writing queries, users can ask questions in natural language and get instant insights.

For example, Celonis’s new Process Copilot (a GenAI chatbot) allows analysts and business users to converse with the platform as if chatting with a colleague, asking which process variant is fastest, why a certain step is causing delays, etc. The AI interprets the question, analyses the data, and responds with findings or even generates charts to answer the question.

Intellifold’s platform introduces a feature called AI Insight Discovery, which uses LLM technology to help classify data, detect anomalies, and uncover hidden patterns or outliers in process flows through simple Q&A. This means a user could ask, “Where are the bottlenecks or rework activities in my order-to-cash process?” and the AI would highlight steps or cases that meet these criteria. Or one might request, “Show me any unusual spikes in processing time last month and potential causes,” and the AI can surface anomaly trends and relevant case examples. Essentially, it aims to get actionable answers faster by removing the manual effort of slicing and dicing data.

Many of these assistants also provide recommended questions or next steps to the user. The focus is on making solution exploration conversational and efficient, so that business users (not just data scientists) can quickly pinpoint opportunities such as compliance issues or customer experience pain points and easily find the root causes.

AI solution development

Another cutting-edge use of AI in this domain is speeding up the creation of new analyses, dashboards, and process solutions. Each business has unique processes and questions, and building custom dashboards or queries can be time-consuming if done manually.

Intellifold’s AI Solution Development capability addresses this by using AI (and the vendor’s internal knowledge base of processes and systems) to translate a user’s question into queries and dashboard visualisations. For example, if a user asks, “I need to see a visualisation of invoice processing times by department and identify any outliers,” the AI can interpret this request, map it to the data model (knowing what “invoice processing time” means, which table contains that info, how “department” is defined, etc.), and then generate a new dashboard or query to fulfill the request. This involves the AI doing tasks like KPI translation to the data model, code generation for queries, suggesting the most appropriate visualisation, and even performing automated validation of results.

The outcome is that a user with minimal technical skill can quickly get a custom chart or analysis tailored to their needs, without waiting weeks for a data analyst or IT person to develop it. While Intellifold is a key player offering this kind of AI-driven solution customisation, other vendors are exploring similar avenues.

Celonis has demonstrated that its Copilot can build graphs or apply complex filters through a chat prompt, and no doubt more platforms will integrate LLM-based solution generation as the technology matures. The major benefit is a much closer alignment of the tool’s output with the business’s unique objectives, achieved quickly through AI assistance rather than lengthy manual development.

These AI-powered features are still emerging, but they represent a significant trend in process intelligence: making the tools more accessible, smart, and adaptive. By enabling conversational insight discovery and automated solution building, vendors are lowering the barrier for business users to harness process data. This not only saves time but also helps organisations get to value faster.

It’s worth noting that the effectiveness of such features depends on the quality of the underlying models and training (especially domain-specific knowledge). As these capabilities mature, they could become a deciding factor for those who want to empower non-technical users and accelerate continuous improvement.

Services and Support Models (Tailored vs Self-Service)

Implementing a process mining or intelligence solution is not just about software, it also involves services, expertise, and ongoing support to truly drive value. Different vendors offer different models for how customers can get up and running and continuously improve their processes. Organisations need to consider whether they prefer a more self-service approach (handling setup and solution development internally) or a vendor/partner-supported approach (leveraging consultants and experts to guide the way). Here we compare how vendors stack up in terms of services and what to think about:

Initial Implementation & Data Connection: Connecting the tool to your various systems and creating the first process analyses can range from straightforward to complex. Some products emphasize quick deployment. For example, ProcessMaker highlights “plug-and-play” installation that can start showing results in 30 days, without requiring heavy custom integration. Similarly, Apromore’s no-code approach is aimed at faster setup for simple use cases (especially if using their provided templates). On the other hand, enterprise-grade platforms like Celonis often require more extensive integration work for each source system, especially if event logs are not readily available. This typically involves setting up multiple connectors or even building custom extraction scripts for niche systems, which can be time-consuming and may need technical experts. In general, if a company has many diverse systems, relying on vendor or partner expertise can accelerate data sourcing and ensure data flows are accurate, efficient, and secure.
Solution Development & Customisation: After the tool is connected, there is a phase of developing dashboards, analyses, and use-case-specific solutions. This is where deep process and data knowledge is needed to tailor the product to the business’s questions. Vendors differ in how much help they provide: IBM, for instance, often pairs its software with IBM Consulting services, offering their process experts to design customised process models, simulations, and reports for the client. SAP Signavio customers can leverage SAP’s process experts or integration consultants who know SAP processes well. Smaller vendors like Intellifold take a tailored approach combining a self-service platform with in-house consulting expertise to ensure the solution delivered aligns with business needs. Consultancy services typically involve working closely with business users to configure the analysis, define KPIs, and even implement improvements, effectively providing end-to-end service from data load to insight and action. This is especially valuable for organisations that may not have a full team of data scientists or process experts on staff. In contrast, a pure self-service approach might rely on your internal team to learn the tool, build, and validate.
Training & User Enablement: Regardless of who builds the solutions, training and support are crucial so that process owners and analysts can get the most value. Many vendors provide training programs and certifications. For example, Celonis runs Academy courses to certify users, and Software AG (ARIS) has long-standing training for ARIS business architects. Especially, if a tool has a reputation for complexity, then robust training and perhaps on-site workshops are worth considering as part of the package.
Ongoing Improvement & Advisory: Process mining is not a one-off project. The real value comes from continuous monitoring and improvement. Many consulting firms (Big Four and others) have services to regularly review process mining insights and identify new improvement initiatives for clients. Some vendors include monitoring and advisory in their subscription or have Customer Success teams for this. Some vendors, like Intellifold, are willing to tie their fees to achieved process improvements. Their model of smaller subscription fees linked to measurable improvements means they have a stake in continuously helping clients succeed. When choosing a vendor, it’s worth asking do they provide expert guidance over time and not just sell software. Help in interpreting observations, prioritising initiatives, and automating or redesigning processes can be extremely valuable and impact long-term ROI, especially if your organisation lacks in-house skills.

In summary, match the service model to your needs. If you want a quick win and have limited in-house expertise, look for vendors known for fast deployment and strong support. They can provide templates, do the heavy lifting on data and analysis, and even guide improvement workshops. If you have a capable team and just need the software, you might opt for a platform that gives you flexibility and control.

Most successful deployments involve a combination: initial handholding by the vendor or partner, coupled with training to enable your team for the long run. The good news is that most major vendors recognise the importance of add-on services for product support and process improvement.

Vendor and Product Profiles

Below we profile some of the most prominent Process Mining and Process Intelligence products on the market, highlighting eachvendor’s focus, expertise, and services. This list covers established leaders and innovative players:

Focus & Expertise: ServiceNow, a platform widely used for IT Service Management and workflow applications, introduced Process Optimization (now also called ServiceNow Process Mining) as an in-platform feature. The focus here is providing native process mining for workflows and processes managed in ServiceNow. Typical use cases are analysing ITSM processes (incidents, requests, changes), HR service requests, customer service cases, that are tracked in ServiceNow. The solution can automatically map out processes like “Incident Management” by looking at the audit logs in ServiceNow tables and show variations between teams or departments. It supports core mining features such as discovery, basic analytics, and internal benchmarking of process performance. It also has some unique capabilities like model-based analysis to define a reference process flow in ServiceNow and compare actual cases to that model. ServiceNow’s Process Mining is fully integrated with its workflow and dashboard capabilities. For example, from an insight, you could directly jump to a ServiceNow dashboard or initiate a workflow to address the issue within the unified platform.

However, compared to standalone mining tools, ServiceNow’s offering is a bit more limited in scope. It does not have things like task mining, pre-processing or advanced predictive analytics. It covers the basics to help ServiceNow customers optimise the processes they already manage in that platform. An advantage is that depending on your ServiceNow tier, you may have a version of Process Optimization included in the license or available at a modest add-on cost.

Services & Ecosystem: Adopting ServiceNow Process Mining is typically straightforward when already using ServiceNow, just activation and some configuration. ServiceNow’s own professional services or partners can help set up the initial analyses (especially to configure any custom process that isn’t out-of-the-box). The strength here is the you can incorporate process mining widgets into ServiceNow’s Performance Analytics dashboards, and use ServiceNow’s robust alerting and task assignment capabilities as “action workflow” on mining insights. On the flip side, if you want to analyse processes that span beyond ServiceNow (say part of the process happens in CRM or an ERP system), you would need to import that external data into ServiceNow which can require custom ETL, and less seamless for cross-system processes. Also, organisations looking for very advanced process analytics might find ServiceNow’s tool a bit basic. Many companies use ServiceNow and other Process Mining products for processes outside ServiceNow.

Focus & Expertise: ABBYY Timeline is part of ABBYY’s suite of process intelligence solutions. ABBYY is a company known for OCR and AI technologies, and Timeline came via an acquisition of TimelinePI. The focus of ABBYY Timeline is on detailed process and task analysis with an AI angle, particularly around user interactions. It brands itself as an “AI-driven process and task intelligence” platform. One of its hallmarks is strong task mining. It can capture what users do on their computers (with appropriate privacy controls) and map those into processes. This is great for environments where not all steps leave a system log (e.g., steps done in Excel or via email). ABBYY emphasizes AI for pattern recognition. It can automatically find common process patterns or detect outliers, using ML on the timeline data. It also provides predictive analytics to forecast process outcomes and has robust features for mapping out end-to-end processes that combine system data with human task data. Another strength is privacy-protecting capture mechanisms, which allow organisations to get task details without violating privacy (like blurring sensitive information). Timeline supports discovery, variant analysis, and alerting. It has some process simulation and basic process modelling, but it’s not as modelling-focused as ARIS or Signavio.

Services & Ecosystem: ABBYY sells Timeline both directly and through partners (it often partners with consulting firms that add process mining to their digital transformation projects). Many Timeline users come via the angle of wanting to do task mining or workforce analysis. For example, BPO (outsourcing) companies use it to analyse how their staff handle tasks. ABBYY provides support and some consulting, but they rely heavily on a partner ecosystem for deployments (similar to their OCR business model). A noted limitation is that data integration is somewhat limited out-of-the-box. Timeline expects you to feed it the data, often via its low-code data connectors or by pushing data from other systems. It doesn’t have many native connectors as Celonis or Signavio. Also, while it can show process flows from event data, its process modelling capabilities are and it doesn’t execute actions natively. If you want to automate something, you’d use a separate RPA or workflow tool (ABBYY partners with others for that). On the plus side, Timeline’s user interface is considered quite user-friendly and visually rich. Many mid-to-large enterprises that specifically want to improve operational efficiency at the task level like call centre processes or back-office operations choose Timeline.

Focus & Expertise: Intellifold is a newer entrant that differentiates itself by offering a self-service process mining platform augmented with AI, along with tailored consulting services. The focus is on delivering end-to-end solutions for process improvement, not just software, but also the expert guidance to make improvements happen. Intellifold’s platform covers the essential process mining functions like process discovery, insight dashboards, rich analytics (including an SQL-like query interface), predictive analytics (ML-based forecasting), and even data pre-processing capabilities for efficiency. It can integrate with common enterprise systems via API or database connectors (and the team prides itself on deep knowledge of source systems, knowing how to interpret data in the context of business processes). Intellifold also includes alerting and some automation triggers (AI agents) to help intervene in processes in real-time. Unique in Intellifold’s offering are the AI features like the conversational AI assistant to explore data (AI Insight Discovery) and the capability to rapidly create new analyses (AI Solution Development). These give Intellifold an innovative edge, making it easier for users to get insights and customise the platform to their needs without heavy technical effort. The platform does not currently include a built-in process modeler or task mining component. Intellifold chooses to focus on mining actual system data and providing AI-guided analyses on that. It also does not have a full workflow module inside the product, it relies on sending alerts or integrating with external workflow tools for follow-up actions. This lean approach keeps the product straightforward, leaning on AI and integration to cover those gaps.

Services & Pricing: Intellifold’s strategy is to pair the software with consulting to deliver business value. They engage closely with clients to understand specific pain points (e.g., reducing compliance breaches, improving customer service times, etc.), then configure their platform to address those and even help implement solutions. They tout deep system knowledge and a comprehensive internal knowledge base (of KPIs, best practices) which the AI uses to deliver tailored insights. This means clients benefit from industry-specific metrics and recommendations out of the box. Intellifold also offers flexible pricing models, including outcome-linked pricing which can result in lower fees, especially for mid-sized clients, and align costs to actual improvements achieved. This is different from most competitors who charge large upfront license fees regardless of results. Because Intellifold is a smaller vendor, clients often get more personalized support such as direct access to the development and consulting team, faster response to feature requests, and custom solution development as needed. The trade-off is that Intellifold is still growing its market presence, so its client reference base is smaller, and it may not (yet) have the vast community or partner network. That said, for many organisations, particularly those who may have felt “left behind” by larger enterprise tools due to cost or lack of internal expertise, Intellifold provides a very “hands-on” partnership approach and is well-suited for companies that want quick, customised solutions without necessarily having to invest in building an internal data science team.

Comparison of Leading Process Mining Products

All the above solutions aim to help organisations leverage data for process improvement, but they differ in focus areas, strengths, and potential downsides. Below is a comparative overview across a few key dimensions:

Breadth of Functionality: Almost all leading tools cover the core discovery and dashboarding. However, some provide a more comprehensive suite than others. Celonis and IBM are at the high end, they offer nearly every feature. ARIS and Signavio also cover a wide range, especially with modelling and compliance tools. In contrast, lighter tools like ProcessMaker or ServiceNow might skip certain advanced features such as extensive data pre-processing or predictive analytics, or even miss task mining or modelling like ServiceNow. Intellifold finds a middle ground including advanced analytics like predictive ML and SQL querying, and data pre-processing like the big players, but does not include Process Modelling or Task Mining. If you specifically need a feature like Task Mining, tools such as UiPath, ABBYY, ProcessMaker have an advantage. If Process Modelling and Conformance checking is key, SAP Signavio or ARIS are better suited, whereas others like Celonis only offer rudimentary modelling.
Depth of Analysis and Intelligence: For performing complex analyses or getting intelligent insights, the “brains” of each tool matter. Celonis is known for powerful analytics at scale and has a rich query language for slicing data deeply. Apromore and IBM have strong academic and AI foundations, meaning their predictive algorithms and simulation engines are robust. ABBYY Timeline and Intellifold differentiate by using AI to automatically surface insights, ABBYY through pattern detection in timelines, Intellifold through LLM-driven anomaly detection and recommendations. Tools like ServiceNow or UiPath have more straightforward analytics; they might not automatically find root causes, but they provide the visuals to do so manually. If you require heavy-duty “what-if” simulation or optimisation, IBM and ARIS stand out. For AI-driven insights and guidance, Celonis’s Copilot and Intellifold’s AI Insight Discovery are leading the way, whereas others are catching up.
Integration and Data Connectivity: All tools need to get data, but the ease varies. Celonis likely has the broadest set of pre-built connectors and an extensive ETL capability. SAP Signavio is excellent for SAP sources (pre-built content for SAP tables), but for non-SAP need additional work. UiPath and ABBYY offer low-code connectors with relatively easy ways to bring in data, but they might require some technical setup and are not as extensive as Celonis’s library. ProcessMaker and Intellifold have a more limited set of integration options, levering database connectors, standard APIs, or custom scripting. If you have a vast array of systems (legacy, modern cloud apps, etc.), a tool with a strong integration framework like Celonis or IBM can be beneficial. If your processes largely live in one ecosystem, then a tool specific to that ecosystem could reduce integration headaches.
Process Improvement and Action: Discovering issues is only the first step; fixing them is what drives business value. UiPath and IBM integrate directly with automation (RPA/BPM) and shine if the improvement is to automat tasks. Celonis has the Action Engine and workflow connectors to trigger actions in other systems (like create a ticket, send notification, or even call an API). ServiceNow leverages its internal workflow and directly build a fix in the ServiceNow platform. Intellifold’s philosophy is to provide recommendations and even AI-driven solution suggestions and then work with clients to help implement changes through consultancy style services for process improvement, system changes, and automation through scripts and agents. Tools like ARIS provide detailed models which make it easier to communicate changes and design new processes, but the actual implementation might be via another execution engine. ABBYY Timeline doesn’t directly implement changes but can feed findings to an RPA tool through partners like Automation Anywhere or Blue Prism. If an organisation wants a closed-loop system where the mining tool not only finds issues but also automates responses, UiPath (mining + RPA) or a combination like Celonis with action flows would be advantageous. If the organisation’s focus is more on human-centric improvements (like training people, changing policies), then the emphasis might be on good reporting and collaboration.
Ease of Use and User Base: There’s a spectrum from highly technical tools to business-friendly ones. ProcessMaker PI and ServiceNow aim to be very easy for business users, with simplified interfaces and minimal coding. Intellifold also prioritises a user-friendly interface and self-service experience, augmented by AI to reduce the need for technical know-how. Celonis and ARIS, historically, have been power-user tools, very capable but requiring training to use effectively. Celonis has improved UX over time and with the Copilot AI, it’s trying to become more accessible to the average business user. UiPath strikes a balance: its mining tool requires some know-how, but the overall UiPath suite is designed for simplicity. Apromore might require more tech savvy if using their open-source version, the enterprise edition with a GUI is better for analysts. When comparing, consider who will primarily use the tool: dedicated analysts in a CoE, or operational managers. If it’s the latter, something straightforward would yield better adoption. Also, some vendors offer specific role-based interfaces with a simpler view for business users versus an analyst.
Cost and Licensing: While specific pricing is not available, generally Celonis and IBM are at the higher end in terms of licensing and implementation cost. They often target large contracts. SAP Signavio pricing might be favourable for those who are SAP enterprise customers (bundle deals), but it’s still an enterprise product. UiPath can sometimes be more cost-effective if you already have UiPath RPA licenses. ServiceNow Process Mining makes sense with ServiceNow’s top tiers. Apromore could be the least expensive if you use the open-source version and have in-house talent (basically just your infrastructure cost). Their enterprise support subscription is typically cheaper than big vendor licenses, but you also get a bit less polish. ProcessMaker PI positions itself as lower cost than Celonis, they even mention a range from a few thousand up to farless than Celonis’s typical millions, making it attractive for smallerbudgets. Intellifold offers flexible models like pay-as-you-go or outcome-based, which can significantly reduce upfront cost. When considering cost, also consider the total cost of ownership: a cheaper tool might require more internal effort, whereas a pricier tool with included services might save you that effort.

In a condensed view, one could say: Celonis is best in class functionality, but complex and expensive; SAP Signavio is great if you are an SAP house and want mining & modeling together; IBM is great for simulation and if you value IBM’s one-stop services; UiPath is best for automation-centric improvements and ease of integrating with RPA; ServiceNow is convenient for ServiceNow-contained processes; ARIS is ideal for comprehensive process governance alongside mining; ProcessMaker is quick deployment, mid-market friendly, but limtied advanced analytics; Apromore is advanced analytics on a budget (open-source flexibility), but require more technical expertise; ABBYY is task mining and AI insights for operational detail; Intellifold is tailored AI-driven solution with end-to-end support at a lower cost entry point. Each has trade-offs, so the key differences truly depend on what matters most to the organisation’s needs.

Choosing the Right Solution for Your Needs

Given the variety of options, it’s important to align the tool with the specific context and goals of your organisation. Selecting the right process mining product depends on matching its strengths to your priorities. Large enterprises with complex systems lean towards comprehensive platforms like Celonis or IBM, especially if they have the resources to support them. Companies deeply invested in certain ecosystems (SAP, ServiceNow, UiPath, etc.) often opt for the complementary tool from that ecosystem for seamless integration. Organisations that need agility, quick results, or a more cost-effective approach might choose newer or specialised tools like Intellifold, ProcessMaker, or Apromore which can deliver targeted value without heavyweight infrastructure.

Finally, consider the vendor’s service model: a tool is only as good as the improvement it enables. Sometimes a slightly less feature-rich tool with excellent support will yield better outcomes than a top-tier tool that you struggle to fully use. Each vendor has a unique blend of focus and expertise, so by understanding those, you can make an informed decision aligned with your business objectives. And remember, the Process Mining market is evolving fast, especially with AI entering the fray. Whichevertool you choose, keep an eye on new features and be ready to take advantage ofinnovations to stay ahead in your process excellence journey.

Share this insight

See your processes, clearly

Get started Book demo

Sign up for a free trial!